Charlie Fletcher co-wrote this article.

“To be thrown upon one's own resources, is to be cast into the very lap of fortune; for our faculties then undergo a development and display an energy of which they were previously unsusceptible.” (Benjamin Franklin)

Powered by cheap oil, the circulatory system of our economy has globalized, expanding populations, wealth, specialization beyond all historical measure. Yet the founding assumption of our success has failed and we are coasting on the momentum of cheap oil. Increasing supply of cheap oil peaked in May 2005. Since that peak gas prices and home foreclosures have skyrocketed as more and more people cannot afford their commute, food and house payments. The evaporation of Bear Stearns (BSC) indicates the accelerating rate of consequences.

click to enlarge images

Greater circulatory failure is certain if we do not re-tool transportation more quickly than escalating energy costs drag down the economy. The timeline for action is very short but we can turn this crisis into an opportunity; we can change the lifeblood of our economy from oil to ingenuity. America can reestablish its self-reliance.

If we had the answers, we would have solved the problems; oil prices would be falling; there would be no congestion in rush hour; Peak Oil and Climate Change would be resolved.

Since we are not solving the problems, we need more and/or different solutions. Start by understanding our current energy sources and uses. Face the brutal facts of our reality. And churn from where we are to where we need to be.

Efficiency

Our current infrastructure is the cause of Peak Oil and Climate Change. We built this infrastructure. We can build better. Re-tooling will not be easy or quick. It will take 5 years to get a running start and likely 25-50 years to have a sustainable infrastructure base. CSX Railroad's recent TV ads state they can move a ton 423 miles on a gallon of fuel. By choice urban transport is radically less efficient, using a gallon of gas to move a person 18 miles. We know how to do better; we just don't allow innovation.

According to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory transportation is 20% efficient at moving vehicles and goods while 80% drives climate change. Innovations that preempt this waste provide an immediate hope for oil independence and Global Warming.

Brutal Facts

As documented in the book Good to Great, Admiral Stockdale, the leader of American POW’s at the Hanoi Hilton prison camp explained who did not survive the ordeal. The optimists, those who thought we would be out by Christmas, then Christmas after Christmas passed until they died of a broken heart. Those that survived the ordeal exhibited what has come to be called the Stockdale paradox; an unwavering faith that in the end we will prevail while confronting the brutal facts of our current reality.

The brutal facts of our current reality:

  • Cheap oil is gone forever. We are coasting on the momentum of a past age.
  • Our current infrastructure is the cause of Peak Oil and Global Warming.
  • Experts aren’t. Experts in building infrastructure for the age of cheap oil are not experts in re-tooling for decreasing oil availability and increasing costs.
    • The optimists are in control of information. The US Energy Information Administration [EIA] forecasts and records energy information for policy makers. EIA’s two-year forecasts were low by 31% in 2002, 48% in 2003 and 60% in 2004
    • The optimists restrict action. Transportation and power generation are controlled by regulatory monopolies. The regulators are chartered to maintain order. The process of innovation is messy so innovations that can jump fuel efficiency from 18 mpg towards 423 mpg are not allowed.
  • We must adapt more quickly than change overtakes us. Oil double in price in 2007 so we must double efficiency to survive.
  • We do not know the answers. If we did we would have solved the problem. What we need is a process for creating and testing possible answers.

Churn

Churn is the economic equivalent to evolution; the process of trying a lot of stuff and keeping what works:

  • Free market. Churn requires latitude to experiment without a lengthy permission cycle.
  • Innovation. Individuals try innovations to solve niche problems/opportunities that are within their economic abilities.
  • Refine. Some changes are perceived as so much better they excite a cluster of adoption that refines the innovation into commercial potential.
  • Scale. Some changes reach a critical mass and sweep the general population to become the norm.
  • Iterate. Some changes are fads and fade way, some are lasting, and some stay as viable niche solutions.

Regulatory monopolies, like their political equivalents (monarchies, dictatorships) value order above innovation. Organizations are staffed with rule-followers assigned to enforce existing rules. So in a vary orderly way we move towards the consequences of Peak Oil and Global Warming.

As oil prices double, our transportation and logistical infrastructure become more brittle. Our circulatory system has leukemia (Global Warming is killing our planet) and heart attacks (unstable oil prices shocks). Yet we remain hostile to innovations.

Take Morgantown’s PRT (Personal Rapid Transit) system as an example. In 1974 the US Senate formally asked DOT for solutions to prevent future oil embargoes. DOT answered in the 1975 Study PB-244854 recommending Automated Guideways and Personal Rapid Transit. Morgantown became operational in 1975 and has since delivered 110 million injury-free passenger miles.

DOT Study PB-244854 predicted in its report why Morgantown’s innovation would fail to expand beyond Morgantown:

  • Federally sponsored R & D has not included a coordinated program for conversion of successful products into operational systems.
  • R&D programs [US DOT Urban Mass Transit Administration]... have neglected near-term ... simpler approaches to correct transit problems.
  • Institutional failures (rule-followers verse innovators) may hinder implementation.

The rule-followers do not allow rules they enforce to be broken even for better solutions. This happens commercially as well, but with different results. Leaders of computing companies such as Cray, Digital Equipment Corp, Control Data, Data General and others failed to adapt to personal computers and networks. They no longer exist.

Regulatory monopolies should be broken so innovations can churn.

We are facing a choice of adapting or face the collapse of our food, distribution and logistical systems. We believe, we will adapt and prosper, it will be difficult and we will constantly be pressed by time and emergencies. And in 50 years the cost of transportation will be as relatively expensive as cell phones are today.

Timeline

If our logistical system were the Titanic, here is a comparison of timelines:

  • Iceberg warning equates to 1956 Hubbert warned the US would hit domestic Peak Oil in 1970.
  • Iceberg sighted equates to 1970 US experienced Peak Oil as predicted by Hubbert.
  • Impact and Hull breach equates to 1973 Oil Embargo, fragile infrastructure
  • Deck Tilt equates to 2002-2007, 5-fold increase in the price of oil.
  • September 2007 the paradigm shifted as demand pressure exceeded supply resilience. Normal yearly price cycles broke and inventories plummeted trying to compensate. In early 2007 Sadad Al-Husseini, former Saudi Aramco Exploration Minster of this: “There has been a paradigm shift in the energy world whereby oil producers are no longer inclined to rapidly exhaust their resource for the sake of accelerating the misuse of a precious and finite commodity. This sentiment prevails inside and outside of OPEC countries but has yet to be appreciated among the major energy consuming countries of the world.”

  • Between 2008 and 2012 the full effects of Peak Oil and hoarding will seriously harm logistical capacities. Peak Oil is already crushing weaker economies.

Demand (black) cannot exceed Supply (red). Inventories must drops or prices increases to kill demand. On Dec 31, 2007 oil closed at $96.23, well above the projection that will result in $200 per barrel by 2012. Trading range in 2008 will likely be $80-140. If you were on the Titanic, you should be in your lifeboat. It is another paradox, but if every economic community had a lifeboat, we would not need them.

To those that delay action, questioning the payback, please ask this question of yourself, “What is the payback of not having a lifeboat when one is needed?”

Specific actions

Fortunately, economic lifeboats can be locally built and many actions are simple. Unfortunately, most actions take time to ramp up. The quicker communities act the more durable they will be.

As a measure of actions the following formula structures aspects of logistical durability:

Logistical Durability = Experience times Energy (sources, quantity and price) times Efficiency (congestion, fuel economy) divided by Population (rate of consumption) divided by Mass (consumption, vehicles, goods and people)

Following is a breakdown of some actions to enhance logistical durability:

  • Experience. Take the shock out of oil price shocks.
    • Self-reliance. Organize your economic community to live within a solar budget. This will require a per capita energy use similar to an American of the 1920’s.
    • Plant a garden. A typical grocery store basket of food has traveled 1,500 miles. If you grow a third of your own food, your will be protected from serious supply disruptions. This also decreases the mass of good required to be moved.
    • Practice shortages. One weekend a month operate live without using your car and note what is possible and not with current infrastructure.
    • Organize the community to manage security in a supply shock.
  • Energy. Renewables. Like any lifeboat, the more self-contained the better. Solar energy (wind, tides, etc…) adds durability; locally available, with very low operational costs once the infrastructure is installed to harvest. Germany’s Feed-in Tariffs establishes the world’s most effective and free market management of renewable power generation implementation.
  • Efficiency
    • Grant rights of way for building automated guide ways.
    • Apply Automated Guideways to gain container and rail shipping efficiencies in moving pallets and people. Example, JPods/CargoPods move 4 people or 1200-pound pallet a mile using 200 watt-hours of power. Solar collectors, 16% efficient, 6-feet wide mounted over that mile of rail gather 2.5 million watt-hours in a typical day. That is enough power for 12,500 vehicle-miles.
    • Large solar arrays (mounted on automated guide ways) for local generation preempts transmission power lose and powers transportation at the point of collection.
    • Congestion relief is perhaps the best measure of efficiency improvement.
  • Mass (move less)
    • Local economy. Support farmer’s markets and locally produced products. If you operate a business, shorten your supply chains. These actions will also strength local economies and job markets.
    • Reduce the mass of transport vehicles with automated guide ways.
    • Measure food-miles.
  • Population
    • Manage development within water and energy resources.
    • Make energy and mobility plans part of all development planning.
    • World-wide promote women's rights, education and birth control.

Oil is a finite resource that economically peaked in May 2005. The consequences of Peak Oil and Climate Change are global but the solutions are local. Building a lifeboat to save your community contributes to re-tooling mobility. “Many hands make light work.” If enough communities save themselves, the worst of the global consequences can be preempted or mitigated. We can, must and will change the lifeblood of our economy from oil to ingenuity.

Bill James

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article

This article has 7 comments:

  •  
    May 19 10:01 AM
    Bill
    What about third world countries who have oil galore and gasoline prices sudsidised? Do your points stated, affect their future? I believe at current soaring oil prices unconventional reserves will spark new interest especially in the bitumen/tar/heavy oil resoucres and upgrade refineries. Venezuela and Canada may be well poised to impact many countries that have dwindling oil reserves and are far behind on renewable energy policy implementation. Countries use resources that are available to them and the US must understand that fossil fuels and renewables must live in harmony in order to preserve social, labor, corporate and financial structures and slowly transition to "green" future.
  •  
    May 19 05:56 PM
    What about the 116B barrels of oil in US territory which has been put off limits politically?
  •  
    May 19 10:01 PM
    What about countries with subsidized oil? This exascerbates the peak oil issue because oil usage is not tempered by the appropriate market price

    What about the 116 barrels of oil in US territory which has been put off limits politically? I am all for drilling...you need to keep in mind peak oil is about the relationship between oil supply and oil flow. Once we pass the peak flow rate for product wells adding additional oil flow will not offset the decline. I encourage to google Matt Simmons and the oil drum for well reasoned discussions of peak oil
  •  
    May 19 10:42 PM
    An excellent summary of the current and future for irresponsible citizens like myself - my carbon footprint is even bigger than last decade, and I intend to squander as much petroleum as I can before all of those ex-communist countries bring their citizens out of poverty and use up the rest of the available oill!

    An excellent reminder to buy/overweight E&P companies, oil servicecompanies, and also whatever companies milk international consumers without many dimes lft to spend.

    The social impacts of the current fuel pricing situation is bound to make for further class struggles betweeen the have-less and the moderately affluent so-called middle class, somehow i think the notion of community will become even more of a stretch in the good ole USA, and other countries without subsidized transportation fuels.

    Communism and oppression of the third world by their own leaders was the best thing the US had going for it, I agree with the author that things are going to get very interesting in the next 4 years - and I'm not referring to politics.
  •  
    May 20 12:07 PM
    Here is a man who believes in two hoaxes: global warming (now changed to "climate change" by radical environmentalists and politicians who hate oil and coal etc. for the purpose of deceiving the suckers who listen to them) and peak oil.

    No amount of evidence to the contrary will change the minds of people who believe what they hear without carrying out further unbiased investigation on their own.

    I know. I've tried it many times.

    So, I simply make this comment without further explanation.

    Rebeldog
  •  
    May 21 12:01 PM
    This is a superb summary of peak oil and energy supply and demand issues which is really too good and useful to be posted on an investment website. I would urge the author to have it listed on the oildrum.com site. The US Energy Flow Trends diagram is terrific and easy to use. I assume it has been updated for the years closer to 2008? The quality of the comments on the oil drum also tends to be far more intelligent and a careful reader can learn more about the intricacies of an issue than on this frequently narrowly useful finance and investment forum.
  •  
    May 21 09:54 PM
    For those that don't believe peak oil is upon us, and for those that do. State the conditions under which you would change your position. For example, would the increase in oil production over 90 mbpd be enough to convince you? For those skeptics, would it be price? Or overall production numbers?

    And is there a difference between political peak oil and geological peak oil? What does it matter if I can't get it out of the ground?

    So instead of declaring that the world is over (peak oilers), and that it's a gigantic hoax (plenti-oilers?)

    Let's at least contemplate that (1) conditions could exist that would limit further production of oil (geological, political, whatever).

    and (2) Should the conditions work out that further increases in oil production come, and we aren't at peak oil, does this mean that the principles of peak oil aren't good principles anyway?

    Consider steps taken to prevent peak oil an insurance policy. We should spend a small percentage of our income to purchase insurance in the event that peak oil turn out to be true.

    So what would that insurance look like?

    Mike
  • Long Ideas

  • Short Ideas

  • Cramer's Picks

SA Partners

Hedge Fund Jobs

Job Seekers:

  • Search jobs by category
  • Get job alerts by email or live feed
  • Apply online
See full list of jobs »

Employers

  • See all recruitment options
  • Get applications online or by email
Post a job »

Trading Center