Have Index Funds Contributed to Commodity Price Moves?
More on the possible contribution of index fund investment to recent commodity price moves.
We and many others have been discussing whether the surge in investment fund purchases of long positions in commodity futures contracts may have been a factor contributing to the spot prices of those commodities beyond what would be warranted by considerations of physical supply and demand. John Mauldin shares an interesting graphic from Deutsche Bank researchers, showing that the prices of a number of commodities in which no futures market exists have increased even more dramatically than those traded on major exchanges.
 |
I have long been maintaining that the broad run-up in commodity prices generally and oil prices in particular over the last five years has primarily been driven by the fundamentals of production having a hard time keeping up with surging global demand. I have nevertheless also suggested that there are additional factors contributing to the increases we've seen since January of this year. So I was curious to see how some of the "niche metals" featured in the graphic above been doing over the most recent months.
Rhodium and manganese, like the other commodities we've been following, indeed surged dramatically beginning in February:
 |
On the other hand, while cadmium and molybdenum have had a spectacular 5-year run, they have not been doing much in 2008. Cobalt's strong performance has also recently stalled:
All of which leaves me still believing that fundamentals are the most important part of the 5-year story, but that the falling dollar, negative real interest rates, and quite possibly fund purchases of commodity futures contracts have also made an important contribution during 2008.
Related Articles
|
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Trading Center
- Free E-Newsletters
- About Seeking Alpha
- About Us
- Contact Us
- What's New
- Readers Feedback
- Advertise With Us
- Contributors
- Contribute an Article
- Feature Your Book
- Our Contributors
- Anonymous Contributions
- Dispute an Article?
- Legal
- Terms of Use
- Privacy
- Copyright
This article has 1 comment:
- sbenard
- 211 Comments
My Website
Jun 03 12:59 PMEven the (supposed) long-only index funds MUST sell their positions in order to liquidate at the expiration of the contract. Thus, it is literally impossible for them to be "long-only". If the influence of these funds was driving commodity markets, then this phenomenon alone would cause prices to plummet close to expiration periods.
The true causes of high prices are those you've mentioned in your article. Between Washington's spendthrift ways (monetizing the debt causes devaluation of the Dollar), ethanol mandates, and global demand, speculators who shorted these markets would be foolish and fighting against a perform storm pushing prices higher. Who would be so foolish?