In the last post about oil and gasoline, this rapid fire sequence of questions was asked by Vespucian about gold:
- Why do you think gold is only at $900?
- With the dollar dropping the way it is shouldn't it be at more like $1,100+ right now?
- Are the central banks dumping the stuff?
- I find the current discrepancy between oil and gold odd. What's your view?
- Could you do a post on it?
It might be easiest to work backwards...
5. Yes.
4. I don't think there's much to be concerned about - it's best to just buy and hold the stuff and not pay too much attention to the week-to-week and month-to-month moves. I never really thought too much of the "oil-to-gold ratio" anyway. Most people would probably say that oil is overbought right now and if anyone can ever make any case for how you properly value gold, I'd like to hear it.
A few charts should help...
The United States Oil ETF (USO) isn't the best proxy for oil futures, but it's handy, so, since the beginning of the year, it's been all oil, all the time:
And this is true if you go back one year to last summer - back then a barrel of oil cost about $65 and an ounce of gold cost about $650. Since that time, oil has more than doubled and gold has gained less than 50 percent.
But if you go back two years, all of a sudden, things look a little more even, much of this a result of the late-2006 energy sell off that pushed oil prices down to about $55 at one point.
It's interesting to note that the oil corrections have been much more severe than gold corrections.
If you go back to their respective lows of about $15 for oil in 1998 and $275 for gold in 1999, then today's prices represent gains of 900 percent for oil but just 300 percent for gold.
I think the supply outlook for oil (i.e., peak oil) is changing everything there is to know about oil prices at the moment - the average oil price last year was only $65.
3. I've heard practically nothing about central bank gold sales lately - the 400 tonne sale by the IMF is hanging over the market right now which may be keeping a lid on prices, but the move from $650 to the current $900 or so in the last nine months was a pretty big move.
It's too bad the central banks can't produce about 10 trillion barrels of oil as easily as they can produce 400 tonnes of gold - that would solve a lot of problems.
2. Going forward, the relationship between the U.S. Dollar Index and the gold price will become less and less important, but apparently it's still important to traders. I for one, think this relationship is overrated as the dollar and gold have risen together before (see 2005) but, admittedly, the biggest moves in the past have come when the dollar loses value against other currencies.
1. Gold is at $900 because that's where it is. It was much lower a few years ago and it will be much higher in another few years - that's how things work with fiat money systems as they work their way toward their eventual conclusion. I wouldn't spend too much time worrying about the month-to-month stuff.
Related Articles
|
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »




This article has 20 comments:
- chistletoe
- 45 Comments
My Website
Jun 10 08:25 AM- theinvestingspeculator
- 133 Comments
My Website
Jun 10 10:08 AMtheinvestingspeculator...
- faststock123
- 3 Comments
Jun 10 10:52 AM- sorgmot
- 107 Comments
My Website
Jun 10 10:52 AMThe seasonal cycle for gold and gold stocks in US $ runs up from the end of September to the following April and then goes level or sags until the next September..
The business cycle upswing in US $ for gold should start in late 2008 and run through 2009, and 2010 before pausing for 2 or three years.
The long, multi decade cycle, is currently in the collapsing liquidity phase (higher interest rates and lower unit prices for stocks, bonds, real estate, and even at some point commodity prices). Liquidity peaked in 2000 with high stock prices and has been falling ever since. It is now 1938 and commodities are recovering from there 1932 lows.
If the US $ keeps falling against foreign currencies which it will since the US is now the 1938 Brittan and Euro-Asia is now the 1938 USA, then commodities should rise as the US $ falls. Or one could buy Euro-Asia currencies. Euro-Asian stocks, bonds, real estate will fall in terms of their own currencies but not commodities which are in short supply.
Good luck.
- GMiki
- 253 Comments
Jun 10 11:42 AMMany of the analysts expect seasonality to falter this year and gold to rise over the summer due to the economy.
- budfoxtoday
- 2 Comments
Jun 10 12:23 PMTim - One way to arrive at a theoretical value for gold would be to work through the assumptions of the key variables that would need to be answered if the U.S. were to be forced back on the gold standard - a debate that did receive a fair amount of attention in the early 80's. (I might also note a topic that should receive more attention in the coming months as it becomes apparent to the market that the Federal Reserve doesn’t have the required FX reserves to intervene and stop an assault against the dollar).
The best book that I have read that discusses the role of money in an economy, and discusses the steps that would need to occur if the U.S. were forced back on a gold standard is Murray Rothbard's The Mystery Of Banking. If you apply Murray Rothbard's logical analysis of the workings of a gold standard to today’s insane monetary environment you get an "official price" (more accurately a weight of gold per dollar) that would shock even the most bullish gold bug around – I will leave the math to you as it would take the fun out of the shocking discovering if I shared it with everyone here.
- moonbat1775
- 567 Comments
My Website
Jun 10 01:44 PMThe Mystery of Banking by Murray N. Rothbard can be downloaded for free at:
www.mises.org/Books/my...
- User 30121
- 275 Comments
Jun 10 02:41 PM- budfoxtoday
- 2 Comments
Jun 10 03:35 PMOn Jun 10 02:41 PM User 30121 wrote:
> To Budfoxtoday: That book was interesting, but lets face it. The
> SINGLE MOST obstacle preventing his suggestion to becoming a reality
> is that THERE IS NO GOLD IN FORT KNOX!!!!! I'll wait while you provide
> us with PROOF! In the meantime, I will provide the "magic" figure
> of Rothbard's logic as the "official price" of gold therein: $500
> per ounce! Pure BullSpit!
- doginyourcoffee
- 2 Comments
Jun 10 03:57 PM- moonbat1775
- 567 Comments
My Website
Jun 10 04:08 PMThanks for your comment. I have not bought as much as I would like to yet. (Please keep dropping, price of gold)
- gerrele
- 10 Comments
Jun 10 04:50 PMMONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL; AND MANKIND'S INHERENT GREED MAKES HIM THE LOUDEST "ROOTER".
- misterchan
- 62 Comments
Jun 10 05:20 PM- misterchan
- 62 Comments
Jun 10 05:25 PM- misterchan
- 62 Comments
Jun 10 05:34 PM- moonbat1775
- 567 Comments
My Website
Jun 10 07:20 PMyour instincts are correct, but greed is a given and not necessarily bad. What is intolerable is FRAUD and THEFT. These are the twin foundations of fractional reserve banking. The Mystery of Banking by Murray N. Rothbard, an extremely famous libertarian, is availabe for free at: www.mises.org/Books/my...
- bill d
- 190 Comments
Jun 11 02:20 AMI can just as easily get anything with my guns and oil to run my car as you can get with your gold and I can get that too.
It's not a consumable and the supply keeps increasing, it's hard to store (and protect), the industrial uses of it have declined compared to silver, rhodium, platinum, copper, etc.
Oil on the other hand -
- Chin
- 1 Comment
Jun 11 05:31 AM- Robert Sczech
- 23 Comments
Jun 11 04:06 PMGold is money (according to J.P Morgan). No form of money can store wealth. Oil is wealth. More generally, wealth is any form of assets which allow survival now and in the future. (If you can not attract a woman, you have no future.) Although it is true that gold can be exchanged into real wealth, that should not tempt us to think that gold is wealth. If nobody is going to share food with you, you are going to perish regardless of how much gold you own. The acceptability of gold in the market depends on the marginal surplus of real wealth. If the farmer is starving, he will not share with you his remaining food. Ownership of gold does not protect against the risk of drowning and starving to death. For that reason gold can not be wealth.
Regarding the gold/oil ratio, that ratio will continue to go down. People who do not believe that do not understand the consequences of peaking energy production. For the next 20 years, oil will be a better investment than gold. The oil market can not be controlled since it is too large. The gold market being very small has and continues to be controlled. Gold will continue to underperform inflation. Nevertheless, we can not afford not to hold gold.
- maher
- 70 Comments
Jun 12 05:58 PM