How Will Freddie and Fannie's Lifeline Affect US and Asian Banks?
-
Font Size:
Excerpts from Dr. Enzio von Pfeil's July 14, 2008, appearance on CNBC Asia:
- The U.S. government is throwing a lifeline to mortgagers Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) (the two "Fs" below)
-- will this mark a shift to a more volatile phase of the credit
crisis? How much will other financial companies in Asia struggle with
their earnings?
- This lifeline is only a band-aid, not a solution.
- Thus, I agree that this is going to cause greater volatility: because both Fs have had to get government support, they will not be as keen to take on more and more mortgages, as before. So the banks that originate the mortgages won’t want to grant as many. Besides, the reason that house prices are falling is because people are SELLING homes, not buying them. This suggests that the volume of mortgages must fall, too.
- Indeed, the last mortgage “up” cycle lasted from September 1999 (when annual growth in mortgage lending contracted by 5%) until November 2005, when it peaked at an annual rate of 44%. Back of the envelope work suggests that “down” cycles last an average of three years, suggesting that the current down-cycle will last until around the middle of 2010.
- So, volatility rises because banks don’t lend.
- The stinger is what happened last Friday in California, however: America witnessed its third-largest bank collapse ever! Mortgage lender IndyMac Banccorp [IMB] went under. According to the South China Morning Post of July 13, 2008, it “specialized in mortgages that often required minimal documents from borrowers for income proof.”
- Along with others, my view is that there are plenty more such banking collapses on the way: as in any cobweb cycle, this is downsizing time.
- That will further stress not only America’s, but also foreign banks.
- Oil
breaks new record above $147 a barrel after Iran test-fired missiles
and tensions escalated in Nigeria. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez
threatened that the price of crude will go to $300 a barrel if Exxon
Mobil (XOM) succeeds again in freezing the financial accounts of Petroleos de
Venezuela SA overseas. How closely are you watching oil?
- I watch oil on a macro basis, and do not claim to be an energy specialist.
- “Get used to high oil prices”!
- High prices are here to stay mainly because of supply constraints.
- Except for “the people,” I cannot imagine anyone having a serious interest in establishing proper peace in the Muddle East (no typo!).
- Besides, why would other oil producers “all of a sudden” want lower oil prices? These are truly boom times for producers.
- Finally, it takes years and billions to find and start new oil wells.
- High prices are here to stay mainly because of supply constraints.
- From a demand perspective, income growth in China and India means that locals want cars and better utilities such as air conditioning and cooking. So energy demand stays high. Besides, the poorer the public transport system, the less “price sensitive” the demand for energy, as in gas and oil, is: people have to get around some how!
- So, from a macro perspective, “get used to high oil prices”!
- MSCI's
main world equity index and U.S. indexes have joined European and
Japanese counterparts in bear market territory, falling at least 20
percent from recent cycle peaks. Is there still money to be made in
Asia with so many bears around us?
- I
find it disgraceful that the world's top economists at the investment
banks have "flagged" recession/stagflation only recently, and suspect
that there is more to this than meets the eye: the avarice of those who
sit on the gold at investment banks. Here is how it works
- The props (i.e. proprietary trading) desks at major banks rule the roost because they sit on the gold – they make most of any large I-bank’s profits. So they are in bed with the bank’s top management.
- Until at least the first quarter of this year, they had huge “long” positions regarding their stock holdings.
- So they sat their chief economists/strategists (“CE”) down and intimated something along the following lines: “We are long of stock.
- You must keep talking the economy/markets up until we can divest of these long positions.
- If you do not help us doing this, we will have cut your bonus – if not fire you.
- You help us and we will help you.”
- “All of a sudden” as of this Spring, you “name” CEs timorously muttering something about “recession” or indeed “stagflation” (my “call” since Spring, 2006).
- So
why would the CEs be talking what should have been obvious even to the
blind for a good year, at least? Step in the props boys again. This
time they start saying to the CE: “Now that we have unloaded our long
positions, we are short of stock – we have invested in huge “short” positions.
- So now, you must start talking the economy/markets down: the more you talk it down, the more the value of our “short” positions rise.
- If you do not help us doing this, we will have cut your bonus – if not fire you.
- You help us and we will help you.”
- I am NOT saying that ALL CEs have been playing this game, nor do I have any axes to grind as I know many of them. These CEs have to be pretty bright to maintain their jobs and be paid so well, which is great. But I AM saying that their lacking objectivity has been conspicuous in its absence, and this is what made me wonder what the motivation was. We all know that in life, most things boil down to two things. Money is one of them.
- I
find it disgraceful that the world's top economists at the investment
banks have "flagged" recession/stagflation only recently, and suspect
that there is more to this than meets the eye: the avarice of those who
sit on the gold at investment banks. Here is how it works
- Asia offers very few money-making opportunities: I hope that the last months’ bad news has put to rest this rather quixotic notion of “de-coupling”!
- The internet means that news is instant. So, when the world’s most muscular market falls, everyone else gets nervous.
- That drop in the US market has a huge impact on consumer psychology: people won’t spend anymore, now that the “tax hike” of higher energy costs, coupled with the sharp slowdown in credit growth, means that people have to tighten their belts.
- All of which implies that the global Economic Time™ must keep worsening – for another good year.
- This will drag Asia down with it. Add to this a sociological one: rising social unrest will undulate more and more.
- So, other than some commodity-related investments, cash is king – worldwide!
This article has 2 comments! Add yours below...
- SWS Group, Inc. F4Q08 (Qtr End 6/27/08) Earnings Call Transcript »
- The Most Essential Secret to Successful Investing »
- Net1 UEPS Technologies, Inc. F4Q08 (Qtr End 06/30/08) Earnings Call Transcript »
- Dollar Financial Corp. Q4 2008 Earnings Call Transcript »
- Merrill Lynch Losses Equal One-Quarter Profits »
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Loading...
Symbols:
ETFs In Focus
sponsored by:
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Latest Commodities Indicator: Fed Policy
- Thoughts on Mohamed El-Erian's 'When Markets Collide'
- Priceline: More Headwinds Ahead
- PFI: PowerShares Dynamic Financials Outperforms Its Peers
- Interview with Kevin Carter, AlphaShares CEO
- Report from the Bond War Frontlines
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Has Jim Cramer Crossed the Line with Sirius XM? »
- Buffett Takes Berkshire Hathaway on $4 Billion Spending Spree »
- Sirius XM Shorts Scrambling to Cover »
- Looming Financial Catastrophe: A Real Inconvenient Truth »
- No Leadership from Apple Right Now »
- AIG and the Lunacy of GAAP Reporting »
- Solarfun Power Holdings Co., Ltd. Q2 2008 Earnings Call Transcript »
- Apple's Biggest Rumor: iPod or Jobs? »
- Independence Day: Decoupling Gold and Silver from the Dollar »
- Frank Barbera: Precious Metals Heading to All-Time Highs »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Again With the Financials - Fast Money Recap (8/29/08)
- Potash One Will Be Top Performer in Agriculture Bull Market
- Luxury Retail Stocks: Two Worth a Look
- 11 Top Canadian Dividend Stocks Available as ADRs
- Natural Gas Is Oversold, and We Are Buying
- Libbey Inc.: The Glass is Half Full
- Mad Money Manual - Cramer's Mad Money (8/28/08)
- An Eye on Gustav - Fast Money Recap (8/28/08)
- Will You Look Back on Today as Your Greatest Missed Opportunity?
- Hedge Fund Manager's Notebook: Why Hummers Are Greener Than Hybrids, and Tech & Homebuilders May Be a Buy
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Priceline: More Headwinds Ahead
- The Option Arm Triplets: Dead Banks Walking
- Short Thesis Still Intact at FirstFed
- Short Story: Lehman
- 'Buy, But Sell' - What Are Analysts Thinking?
- Nordson's Rally Is Over, For Now - Barron's
- What's So Special About RadioShack? - Barron's
- Salesforce.com: It's All About the Guidance
- Three Casino Stocks Rolling Over
- New Web Site For Short Sellers: You Gotta Love Capitalism
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Mad Money Manual - Cramer's Mad Money (8/28/08)
- Diversified Portfolios - Cramer's Mad Money (8/27/08)
- Gustav Moves Overdone - Cramer's Stop Trading! (8/27/08)
- GrafTech is Too Cheap - Cramer's Stop Trading
- The Rebound List - Cramer's Mad Money (8/26/08)
- The List - Cramer's Stop Trading! (8/26/08)
- Can't Turn My Back - Cramer's Lightning Round (8/26/08)
- The Pelosi Factor - Cramer's Mad Money (8/25/08)
- Buy Tech Weakness - Cramer's Lightning Round (8/25/08)
- Fannie & Freddie Too Difficult - Cramer's Stop Trading! (8/25/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »




This article has 2 comments:
Not at all. Strictly speaking, no additional support has occurred. The news is that the government is working on changes that would provide greater support IF IT'S NEEDED. It hasn't yet been needed.
"...the last mortgage “up” cycle lasted from September 1999 (when annual growth in mortgage lending contracted by 5%) until November 2005, when it peaked at an annual rate of 44%. Back of the envelope work suggests that “down” cycles last an average of three years, suggesting that the current down-cycle will last until around the middle of 2010."
Um, if the last up cycle ended in 11/05, and down cycles last three years, how do you get to mid-10?