Financials: How - And When - We Reached the Bottom
One never knows until long after the fact, of course, when stock prices reach the exact top or bottom of a given cycle. And, besides, trying to pick precise tops and bottoms always turns out to be a pointless, unprofitable game. So don’t even try.
Have I hedged myself sufficiently? Good. For, as it happens, I believe July 15, 2008 will turn out to be as good a date as any to mark the end of the long, painful bear market financial stocks have endured for the past 18 months. And more to the point, it marks the beginning of the greatest financial stock bull market in our lifetime, one that will be much broader than the bull market that began in 1990.
Caution! The observation above is offered to investors only. If you can’t stand the idea of seeing another, say, 20% on the downside, please stop reading at once and head back to CNBC.com. If you measure your investment horizon in weeks or months, please, for your own good and sanity, leave this site pronto.
But if you understand what drives stock prices, and have an investment time horizon of at least one year, feel free to keep reading. And if you are a patient value investor, get out your highlighter and get ready to buy stocks.
I believe the current valuations of scores—even hundreds—of financial companies are wildly out of whack with the companies’ long-term earnings potential. The companies are extraordinarily undervalued, in my view. In the vast majority of cases, I can get comfortable with their potential future credit losses and (in the cases where they’re needed) the possibility of future, dilutive capital issuance.
With the gap between current market values and business values so wide, investors shouldn’t even worry too much whether July 15 was indeed rock bottom for the stocks. The margin for error today is so wide that any investor with at least a one-year horizon and a little analytical ability can pick huge winners. We wouldn’t buy across the board, but the vast majority of the depressed financial stocks will survive, recover, and deliver high investment returns from these levels.
Why July 15 was Capitulation Day
Financial services investors had a lot to deal with last week. Do you recall? On Monday, they grappled with news that regulators had closed IndyMac the previous Friday. It was the third-largest bank failure ever. Also over the weekend came word that the Treasury Department and Fed had drawn up plans to stabilize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
It was momentous-sounding news—but, if you think about it, not necessarily negative. IndyMac’s failure couldn’t have been a surprise, thanks to Sen. Schumer. And the prospect of a stabilized Fannie and Freddie should have been seen as a positive, both for the economy and other financials. Even so, investor angst rose and, on Monday, the XLF, an index of large-cap financial stocks, dropped by 5%, closing on its low.
- GM suspends its dividend.
- Retail sales for June come in lower than expected.
- The dollar hits a record low against the euro.
- June PPI comes in higher than expected.
- Long lines ring IndyMac branches, as depositors of the failed bank seek access to their funds.
- A popular bear, Meredith Whitney of Oppenheimer, lowers her rating on Wachovia to “underperform,” citing the company’s bleak prospects.
- Bloomberg runs a story reporting that private equity investor TPG has already seen its spring investment in Washington Mutual cut by two-thirds.
- CNBC interviews its new favorite investment guru, Bill Ackman, about his plan to “save” Fannie and Freddie. Ackman, who admits he just shorted both companies, describes a plan that would wipe out common shareholders of both companies.
Activity During July 15
So what happened next? The following events on the 15th stand out as being especially significant, in my view:
- Financial stocks decline dramatically in the first 45 minutes of trading. It was an across-the-board collapse. Citigroup, which closed at $16.40 on Monday night, traded as low as $14.02, a decline of 15%. Wachovia, the subject of Whitney’s downgrade, was off by 20%.
- The VIX hits 30.82 in the first 45 minutes. The VIX is of course everyone’s favorite measure of investor nervousness. Recent readings above 30 have signaled a peaking in the level of panic.
- First Horizon’s stock rises at the open, despite all the bad news. First Horizon, a heavily shorted banking company, had moved up its earnings release to Tuesday from Thursday after seeing its stock decline 25% Monday over fears about its survivability. After the company released an earnings report that showed it was far from spinning out of control, its stock opened up 5%--despite the panic in the financial sector. The stock closed up 14% on the day.
- Financial stocks stage a dramatic turnaround in the morning before closing lower on the day. For example, the XLF, after its initial 5% decline, rose 9% from the trough, but still closed down 3% on the day.
- An incredible volume of shares trades.On July 15th, 469 million shares of the XLF traded, eclipsing its previous one-day volume record, set the prior Friday, by 150 million shares. This record would fall two days later when 528 million shares traded. July 15th will be a day to remember!
Why July 15, 2008 Will Be Remembered As the Bottom
Beyond the highly volatile, dramatic trading patterns that happened on the 15th, conditions for a turn seem to be in place that will be familiar to anyone who’s lived through a market extreme before.
- Long-term company valuations are extremely depressed. Before trading began on July 15, many financial services companies were trading at valuations wildly out of line with their long-term earnings prospects--simply because of excessive investor fear. The fear has come about from the very real credit problems that have developed over the last 18 months, and the unrealistic expectation that they will persist indefinitely into the future.
With the banks stocks off by 50% in the last three months alone, investors seem to have been stunned into inaction, while bearish momentum investors have piled on their shorts. Rational analysis about companies’ long-term prospects has given way to the simplistic notion that chargeoffs must go higher, so stock prices must go lower. As a result, many financial stocks are significantly undervalued relative to their long-term earnings potential. - Bearish analysts have devised new methodologies to justify current or lower stock prices. Just as tech analysts rolled out new valuation methodologies to justify sky-high stock prices at the peak of the tech bubble in 1998 and 1999, bearish financial services analysts have developed new “methods” to “value” financial stocks to avoid recommending them now.
They are nothing if not resourceful. One analyst, for example, estimates a bank’s entire future losses, deducts that number from tangible book value, then assumes the bank raises additional capital at current (highly dilutive) prices. Then he assumes the stock should trade at or below that estimate of pro forma, adjusted tangible book value. Potential book value growth from future earnings? A return to normal valuation? That counts for nothing.
Clearly all the analyst wants to do is come up with as low a number as he can, whether it makes sense or not, in order to justify his bearish position. This isn’t “conservative” analysis. It’s poor analysis. - New investment gurus are worshiped, while previous ones are said to have lost their touch. Remember back during the tech boom, when great investors such as Warren Buffett, George Vanderheiden, and Julian Robertson were suddenly seen as dinosaurs because they refused to participate in the mania? It was a new era, and those old guys “didn’t get it.” Today Bill Miller, Marty Whitman, Wally Weitz, and others are being criticized not just for their refusal to short the financials, but for actually owning them. People say that “this time it’s different,” and that these erstwhile investment legends suddenly don’t know what they are doing. I’ll bet on the legends.
So who are the new media darlings? One is Bill Ackman, a man with a mixed track record at best. To show how crazy the current environment is, he shorts Fannie and Freddie on Thursday and Friday and then calls CNBC to tell them he has a plan to “save” the companies, which (what a coincidence!) involves a complete wipeout of common shareholders. And CNBC takes him seriously! None of the financial journalists who interviewed him on July 15 questioned his true motivation.
Then there’s Meredith Whitney, who last year raced to become the most bearish bank analyst on Wall Street. She published her latest report last week and held a conference call with investors on July 15. Her new angle: Stay away from bank stocks because future credit losses will be much higher than they think. Why? Well, Meredith discovered that the home-price futures that trade on the Chicago Merc are forecasting greater price declines than the banks expect. The futures market on which Whitney hangs her entire report has an open interest of all of 435 contracts, with a notional value of—are you ready?—$17 million. Since when do equity analysts rely on new, illiquid market pricing to do their forecasting?
- Fears about dividend cuts and new, dilutive capital raised are excessive. Here’s a shocker: an investment bank specializing in the banking industry issues a report that predicts that . . . banks will have to raise a lot of new capital! KBW, the investment bank in question, is not famous for having an especially sturdy Chinese wall separating its research and corporate finance efforts. In any event, it says 180 banks need to raise $30 billion in equity, based on its own stressed-earningS scenario. Do you think the report was perhaps a little self-serving?
In fact, I think second quarter earnings results are providing encouraging signs that the credit problems won’t turn out to be as great as widely feared, that not as much dilutive capital will need to be raised, and that fewer companies will have to cut their dividends. For example, despite its strong recent bounce and better-than-expected second quarter earnings, Bank of America stock still yields 8.7%. - Second quarter earnings reports are so far encouraging. While commercial banks have mostly been the ones to report earnings so far, their reports have been encouraging with respect to credit quality. I’m specifically referring to changes in delinquency rates, slowing inflow of new non-accruing loans, and the lack of meaningful increases in criticized assets.
Even the accounting for credit problems is improving, as companies have tightened up on the classification of loans 90 days past due but not on non-accrual. Banks seem quick to take writedowns on non-accrual loans and are aggressively building reserves.
It is by no means clear sailing from here. Even so, the stocks are significantly undervalued under all but the harshest economic scenario. The evidence from second quarter earnings to date is that that scenario won’t come close to happening.
First Horizon: A Great Example of Undervaluation
To see the mismatch between a company’s valuation and the outlook for its underlying business, let’s look at one bank that’s been a favorite of the shorts: First Horizon (FHN). The company’s stock has been battered over worries regarding its mortgage subsidiary and its large home equity and residential construction loan portfolios. Over the last year First Horizon has fallen from $35 to as low as $4.50 last Monday.
As I mentioned, the company last week moved up its earnings release because of the pounding the stock took on the 14th. It reported a second quarter loss of 11 cents per share. Beneath the headline number, though, underlying trends in credit quality were encouraging, which made us increasingly comfortable with management’s worst-case loss estimates.
In a nutshell, here’s why buying First Horizon at the current $8.25 stock price looks like a great investment opportunity to us.
- Credit is stabilizing.
- Capital has already been raised and cash dividend eliminated.
- The stock trades at 66% of its tangible book value per share.
- The stock trades at 2 times pre-tax, pre-provision earnings.
- The stock trades at 4 times our estimate of “normalized” earnings per share.
I wish I could make this more complicated, but I can’t. The stock sells at an extreme valuation, even as signs emerge that its credit issues are manageable. And not only is capital sufficient, we believe it will prove to be excessive. Given all this, it’s not hard to see First Horizon’s stock price rising into the low 20s over the next 18 months. That’s a three-bagger on the upside without survival risk. I like that tradeoff. (And, yes, in case you’re wondering, we own First Horizon.)
First Horizon is just one of many, many financial services companies that I believe are ridiculously undervalued. No, not all the performance indicators at these companies are headed in the right direction yet. But the signs of a turn are pretty clear. Investors know how expensive it can be to wait for an “all-clear” sign. I’m not waiting for an all-clear. Could the stocks’ prices correct after their strong advance? You bet! But for investors, the time to buy is now.
Related Articles
|
This article has 66 comments:
- buyitcheap
- 425 Comments
Jul 22 10:25 AM- glassbox
- 126 Comments
Jul 22 10:31 AMI'm long XLF and ABK - with at least 1 year horizon. XLF - am expecting US$25-30 by 1 year and as for ABK - I hope to see it go back to US$25, maybe not in a year but perhaps in the next 2 years... I'm sure if that happens, its worth the wait.
- Bespoke BullSh*t
- 16 Comments
Jul 22 10:32 AM- Pent up demand
- 108 Comments
Jul 22 10:40 AM- DSB
- 26 Comments
My Website
Jul 22 10:58 AMI agree that the Financials are undervalued by traditional metrics, however I don't expect to see a bottom until a few things occur (which we probably won't be able to ascertain until after the fact):
1) Defaulting debt returns to normalized levels
2) We have a ratings agencies overhaul, which will allow IB's to trade paper as freely as before they lost trust.
3) Oil falls & remains below $130
4) We have clear indication that unemployment has stopped increasing, CPI is 'contained'
5) We have 2 consecutive quarters without a large/mid sized bank encountering problems.
As 10+ years of inappropriate growth, which has obligated the govt. to back more paper than they are technically able, there must be a proportionate contraction based on the true valuations of not only the foundational collateral, but every derivative link in the chain above it (leverage). We have seen some of this, however this unwinding is very complicated, and the derivative debt spawned from this foundation is in the Trillions of dollars. The level of risk inherent to the market right now is higher than I think most people realize. I have heard quite a few 7 figure heavy hitters defend the JPM/BSC deal as having avoided catastrophe. If you have time, peek behind the curtain to see the moving parts of these statements...
Also, something to note is the velocity of money. Let's assume the above leads to a contractionary environment... As the VM slows (people & businesses unable or unwilling to spend for a variety of reasons, including difficulty in taking out loans), banks will lose out on a lot of transactional business. On the other side of the coin, they still have massive cashflow obligations that they support.
If inflation persists, and grows, big time pressure will be (is) on the fed to raise rates. Remember, they conducted emergency rate cuts in order to keep the banks from failing. When that wasn't enough, they just gave them money. The root of WHY, is defaulting debt - which is the crux of the matter, as articulated by Hank Paulson on CNBC the other day. If they have to raise rates, they kill banks.
- elcopone
- 11 Comments
Jul 22 11:45 AM- morgan77
- 89 Comments
Jul 22 11:52 AMSaw that the housing sector was the big winner last week and did a little more research on it. This article (www.greenfaucet.com/fa...) argues that housing may finally have reached a bottom. Check it out if you're interested in buying.
- Charlie Stromeyer Jr
- 90 Comments
Jul 22 12:14 PMMy question is how much credit derivatives such as credit default swaps (CDSs) are tied to commercial real estate (CRE) prices? I am asking because U.S. CRE prices are having a significant decline.
- CLH
- 618 Comments
Jul 22 12:31 PM- pshah
- 23 Comments
Jul 22 12:48 PMNo bottom: Jim Rogers, Soros, John Paulson, Phil Falcone, Jim Chanos
vs.
Bottom: Hank Paulson, our trusted govt., Bill Miller, author Tom Brown
First, we have a list of investors who have had a very long record of being right and succesful and who continue to bet against the financials and sell the rally (see WSJ today). Then we have the Pollyanas like Miller who's actually ranked in bottom 28% of fund managers by Morningstar for his 10yr performance and Tom Brown who's had a mixed record at best with his blunders like First Marblehead and CCRT.
Its a rout for the no-bottom team.
- Kinabalu
- 131 Comments
Jul 22 01:00 PM- DSB
- 26 Comments
My Website
Jul 22 01:02 PMTo rattle off a few:
- We have never before had such a major crisis of confidence in the ratings agencies. Their job is to accurately asses the risk of loss, and assign a rating to that probability. They rated securities that were so complex that they didn't have any history on which to base their assumptions. The loss of credibility is crippling the market. Trust/Credibility is the glue that holds the world together. When someone don't know for sure whether to trust a propsective purchase, they rely on a 3rd party to recommend (a friend, an agency, references, etc). This is what the ratings agencies have done for decades, this is what makes the Ebay feedback system crucial to their business model. It is also why the world hasn't questioned the Dollar for 60 years. When trust is broken, the system will remain broken until trust is restored.
- The government hasn't had to back a major financial institution in crisis during ANY of our lifetimes, to my knowledge. This is egregious, possibly illegal, and in theory it dilutes the dollar. It takes credibility away from the fed and our currency - however if it was/is not done, we might be in a much worse situation today. Going forward, the fed will be limited in their ability to bail out institutions.
- Our economic strength is tied to our military strength insofar as .60c of every tax dollar goes towards the military. As the dollar weakens, and the tax base shrinks due to economic contraction, how are we going to maintain our global military campaigns. If we aren't the toughest kid on the block (aside from nukes), it becomes a lot harder to throw our weight around.
- The derivatives market has never been this big. A 70+ Trillion system of complex IOUs between financial institutions rests on a foundation of rapidly defaulting debt. During the credit crisis of the early 90's, it was around 9 Trillion. Think of an inverted pyramid. This is why BSC failure would have been catastrophic, as they held up around 8% of this system of IOUs (from what I recall).
- The savings rate in America is flat. This is going to get worse as prices inflate, and people (with all that 'money sloshing around on the sidelines') are going to hoard $ in anticipation of worse times ahead. When the velocity of money slows down, demand falls, companies go out of business, and people baton down the hatches. What will increase the velocity of money? Growth. How do you grow? There must be demand, prices must not choke people out of markets, and there *MUST* be liquidity in the system.
$120/bbl oil has already done damage. Companies have already laid people off in anticipation of hard times ahead, with two quarters of high energy prices putting a thumbscrew on margins.
Nothing goes up or down in a straight line. The fact that the Financials staged a rally 2 business days after the 3rd largest bank failure in US history tells me that people aren't educated as to the real risk in the system right now. It tells me that hopeless optimism persists, justified by "valuations,"... history, and a blind eye to the storm that the world is in right now.
Don't get me started on Europe, which suffers from a housing crisis very similar to ours.
Fix the defaults, fix the world. Save the cheerleader.
- fatcat
- 442 Comments
Jul 22 01:15 PM- pshah
- 23 Comments
Jul 22 01:16 PM- robertredford
- 1 Comment
Jul 22 01:23 PM- debtacid
- 106 Comments
Jul 22 01:23 PMJuly 15, 2008 Will Be Remembered As the Bottom
- Tom Brown.
"We will not have any more crashes in our time."
- John Maynard Keynes in 1927
"I cannot help but raise a dissenting voice to statements that we are living in a fool's paradise, and that prosperity in this country must necessarily diminish and recede in the near future."
- E. H. H. Simmons, President, New York Stock Exchange, January 12, 1928
"There will be no interruption of our permanent prosperity."
- Myron E. Forbes, President, Pierce Arrow Motor Car Co., January 12, 1928
"No Congress of the United States ever assembled, on surveying the state of the Union, has met with a more pleasing prospect than that which appears at the present time. In the domestic field there is tranquility and contentment...and the highest record of years of prosperity. In the foreign field there is peace, the goodwill which comes from mutual understanding."
- Calvin Coolidge December 4, 1928
"There may be a recession in stock prices, but not anything in the nature of a crash."
- Irving Fisher, leading U.S. economist , New York Times, Sept. 5, 1929
"Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau. I do not feel there will be soon if ever a 50 or 60 point break from present levels, such as (bears) have predicted. I expect to see the stock market a good deal higher within a few months."
- Irving Fisher, Ph.D. in economics, Oct. 17, 1929
"This crash is not going to have much effect on business."
- Arthur Reynolds, Chairman of Continental Illinois Bank of Chicago, October 24, 1929
"There will be no repetition of the break of yesterday... I have no fear of another comparable decline."
- Arthur W. Loasby (President of the Equitable Trust Company), quoted in NYT, Friday, October 25, 1929
"We feel that fundamentally Wall Street is sound, and that for people who can afford to pay for them outright, good stocks are cheap at these prices."
- Goodbody and Company market-letter quoted in The New York Times, Friday, October 25, 1929
"This is the time to buy stocks. This is the time to recall the words of the late J. P. Morgan... that any man who is bearish on America will go broke. Within a few days there is likely to be a bear panic rather than a bull panic. Many of the low prices as a result of this hysterical selling are not likely to be reached again in many years."
- R. W. McNeel, market analyst, as quoted in the New York Herald Tribune, October 30, 1929
"Buying of sound, seasoned issues now will not be regretted"
- E. A. Pearce market letter quoted in the New York Herald Tribune, October 30, 1929
"Some pretty intelligent people are now buying stocks... Unless we are to have a panic -- which no one seriously believes, stocks have hit bottom."
- R. W. McNeal, financial analyst in October 1929
"The decline is in paper values, not in tangible goods and services...America is now in the eighth year of prosperity as commercially defined. The former great periods of prosperity in America averaged eleven years. On this basis we now have three more years to go before the tailspin."
- Stuart Chase (American economist and author), NY Herald Tribune, November 1, 1929
"Hysteria has now disappeared from Wall Street."
- The Times of London, November 2, 1929
"The Wall Street crash doesn't mean that there will be any general or serious business depression... For six years American business has been diverting a substantial part of its attention, its energies and its resources on the speculative game... Now that irrelevant, alien and hazardous adventure is over. Business has come home again, back to its job, providentially unscathed, sound in wind and limb, financially stronger than ever before."
- Business Week, November 2, 1929
"...despite its severity, we believe that the slump in stock prices will prove an intermediate movement and not the precursor of a business depression such as would entail prolonged further liquidation..."
- Harvard Economic Society (HES), November 2, 1929
"... a serious depression seems improbable; [we expect] recovery of business next spring, with further improvement in the fall."
- HES, November 10, 1929
"The end of the decline of the Stock Market will probably not be long, only a few more days at most."
- Irving Fisher, Professor of Economics at Yale University, November 14, 1929
"In most of the cities and towns of this country, this Wall Street panic will have no effect."
- Paul Block (President of the Block newspaper chain), editorial, November 15, 1929
"Financial storm definitely passed."
- Bernard Baruch, cablegram to Winston Churchill, November 15, 1929
"I see nothing in the present situation that is either menacing or warrants pessimism... I have every confidence that there will be a revival of activity in the spring, and that during this coming year the country will make steady progress."
- Andrew W. Mellon, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury December 31, 1929
"I am convinced that through these measures we have reestablished confidence."
- Herbert Hoover, December 1929
"[1930 will be] a splendid employment year."
- U.S. Dept. of Labor, New Year's Forecast, December 1929
"For the immediate future, at least, the outlook (stocks) is bright."
- Irving Fisher, Ph.D. in Economics, in early 1930
"...there are indications that the severest phase of the recession is over..."
- Harvard Economic Society (HES) Jan 18, 1930
"There is nothing in the situation to be disturbed about."
- Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon, Feb 1930
"The spring of 1930 marks the end of a period of grave concern...American business is steadily coming back to a normal level of prosperity."
- Julius Barnes, head of Hoover's National Business Survey Conference, Mar 16, 1930
"... the outlook continues favorable..."
- HES Mar 29, 1930
"... the outlook is favorable..."
- HES Apr 19, 1930
"While the crash only took place six months ago, I am convinced we have now passed through the worst -- and with continued unity of effort we shall rapidly recover. There has been no significant bank or industrial failure. That danger, too, is safely behind us."
- Herbert Hoover, President of the United States, May 1, 1930
"...by May or June the spring recovery forecast in our letters of last December and November should clearly be apparent..."
- HES May 17, 1930
"Gentleman, you have come sixty days too late. The depression is over."
- Herbert Hoover, responding to a delegation requesting a public works program to help speed the recovery, June 1930
"... irregular and conflicting movements of business should soon give way to a sustained recovery..."
- HES June 28, 1930
"... the present depression has about spent its force..."
- HES, Aug 30, 1930
"We are now near the end of the declining phase of the depression."
- HES Nov 15, 1930
"Stabilization at [present] levels is clearly possible."
- HES Oct 31, 1931
"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S."
- President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
- Pent up demand
- 108 Comments
Jul 22 01:27 PMAs for the article, I would point out there was a similarly sized rally in financials from August to October last year, which has of course turned out to be a sucker's rally.
I think the scenario an investor needs to think very hard about is a situation where businesses start cutting jobs in a bigger way. What happens if official unemployment rises from these historically low levels? Then the other shoe would drop on the HELOC and credit card areas. Not a prediction; but in that scenario even the healthier banks will suffer badly.
- debtacid
- 106 Comments
Jul 22 01:44 PM"trying to pick precise tops and bottoms always turns out to be a pointless, unprofitable game. So don’t even try."
"July 15, 2008 Will Be Remembered As the Bottom"
- DSB
- 26 Comments
My Website
Jul 22 01:45 PMEither way, this means that if you are in the highest tax bracket, let's say 45% of your income goes to taxes. That means that for the first 5.4 months of the year, 100% of your labor goes to the government. Of that 5.4 months, 2.26 months are spent on the military. So, 2.26 months out of the year, 100% of your work goes towards military spending and military debt obligations. For high wage earners, every hour of every day you work until the end of March goes towards war. HOOAH!
www.nationalpriorities...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
www.truthandpolitics.o...
www.salem-news.com/art...
- DSB
- 26 Comments
My Website
Jul 22 01:49 PM- debtacid
- 106 Comments
Jul 22 01:52 PM"Wachovia Posts $8.66 Billion Loss, Slashes Dividend, Will Sell Assets"
- irondoor91
- 119 Comments
Jul 22 02:01 PMLet me add one more up-to-date quote to your wonderful list.
"This is far and away the strongest golbal economy I've seen in my business lifetime".
-Our esteemed Treasury Secretary Paulson, Fortune Magazine, July 12, 2007
(This couldn't have been much closer to the top and he neglected to mention the mountain of unservicable debt the "global economy" had been built on over the past decade)
- Charlie Stromeyer Jr
- 90 Comments
Jul 22 02:04 PMAlso, according to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), at the end of 2007 just in the OTC derivatives markets there was $596 trillion in outstanding contracts which was 8x the total value of all exchange traded financial contracts.
Until Tom Brown can convincingly explain why there won't be more blowups with derivatives then we should be skeptical that a bottom for the financials has finally occurred.
- DSB
- 26 Comments
My Website
Jul 22 02:06 PM- urbansurvival
- 1 Comment
My Website
Jul 22 02:10 PM- tk6910
- 9 Comments
Jul 22 02:24 PM- buyitcheap
- 425 Comments
Jul 22 02:43 PM- DSB
- 26 Comments
My Website
Jul 22 02:48 PMGo to ibankcoin.com for some reality. Do not let children near the computer.
- themortgagedude
- 2 Comments
Jul 22 02:55 PM- autboy
- 20 Comments
Jul 22 02:58 PMBut DSB has touched the central nerve: how much betrayal of essential trust can a market endure and still hope to prosper. I am often struck by the conservative obsession with getting the government off the backs of businesses so they can create value, jobs, and provide more opportunities for wealth etc,. But seems to me that lays a responsibility on businesses - in this case the financial sector - not to operate so recklessly that government intervention is the only way to prevent collapse. How can anyone observing this situation from the outside rush back in to invest in companies that have behaved so irresponsibly?
- Back & Fill
- 1 Comment
Jul 22 03:12 PM- shure46
- 360 Comments
Jul 22 03:12 PM