WayneS

Comment Stream

Comment Stream
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:
  • Obama Is Greentech's New Genie in a Bottle
    On Jan 05 04:54 PM Drew Gamble wrote:

    > You people just don't get it. Alternative energy is the future. If
    > America doesn't fix its energy situation, there is no hope. It is
    > the country's number one point of vunerability, yet it can be our
    > salvation.

    This is what everyone said in 1980. Alternative energy has not progressed any further than it was in 1980. History repeats itself. As then, now that oil has dropped, alternative energy will fail. No one cares beyond today. Whatever is cheapest today will prevail.
    Jan 06 09:41 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Exxon Apostasy: A Closer Look at the Oil Giant's Real Valuation
    DonaldRay - Nancy Polosi promises to nationalise the American oil companies, the same as Venezuela. And remember Oboma is a socialist, too. Also remember, ExxonMobil paid $16 billion more in corporate income taxes in the US than they made over the last 4 years.
    Jan 05 21:06 pm |Rating: +1 -2 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Exxon Apostasy: A Closer Look at the Oil Giant's Real Valuation

    > what do you think will happen to the price of oil once someone develops
    > a battery capable of easily powering a car? My guess is $5 / bbl,
    > as the only place it will be used is jetfuel and chemical feedstock.

    ExxonMobil has already done this. They have developed a separator that will allow more powerful, lighter and longer lasting batteries in cars. No one has made any real money on gasoline, except the government and bank cards.
    Jan 05 14:05 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Why AIG Gets Billions While GM Gets Scorn
    HomerII - what I was saying is that people say that they want high quality and mpg, then buy a Lexus that goes 176 mph (at least that's what their ad says). GM has high quality, high mpg vehicles. So do the rice-burners. They aren't selling that well. Most people are buying large or fast vehicles, drive them fast and hard and then cry about the cost of the vehicle and fuel. Then they blame everyone else.
    I, myself, drive a Buick LeSabre. I get over 30 mpg. I am retired now. When I was working and computing to work, I got over 75 mpg. I carpooled.
    Dec 16 13:29 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • What Will Move Oil: Obama's Package or Falling Chinese Demand?

    On Dec 15 10:26 AM Ishortyou wrote:

    > I think is time for the oil companies stop banking on oil dependent
    > energy sources and start shifting their portafolio to more greener
    > sources, put the money on it.

    The oil companies invested heavily in the 1980's into what we now call alternative energies . They found them unprofitable and that they would never make more than a few percent difference. The same is true today. They have shifted to "greener" natural gas. Oil is more valuable as non-energy products. Gasoline was a waste product until they talked Ford into using it to fuel his new automobiles. It has never has had much of a profit margin. ExxonMobil developed a material for use in batteries that may make electric cars safe and reliable with more than a 20-50 mile range.
    Hopefully, they will continue invest in viable energy sources.
    Dec 16 13:06 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Why AIG Gets Billions While GM Gets Scorn



    On Dec 13 01:02 AM edtheincomeinvestor wrote:

    > The Big Three doesn't make cars that we want (high MPG, quality,
    > etc) Guess who killed the electric car? GM! I would have gladly brought
    > the EV1, instead got a Prius.

    We want big vehicles with bright headlights. Go past a Toyota dealership and all you see are SUV's and pickups. My first car a 1960 American-made car got over 30 mpg and lasted 300,00 miles. I get a new American-made car every ten years or so.
    Dec 15 14:11 pm |Rating: 0 -2 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Real Price of Gas Falls to Five-Year Lows



    On Dec 06 11:54 PM Perception wrote:


    > wut? look at the RBOB vs. crude price history. they were in lockstep,
    > as they should be. refiners were by no means subsidizing gas prices.


    You are right, they weren't subsidizing gasoline, they were just selling it for less than it cost to make it, as reported by Valero and other refiners.
    Oil doubled in price (actually the dollar went down) and gasoline went up 37%.
    Dec 11 09:30 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Exxon's Latest Ad Campaign: So Last Summer
    you are off by over 30 years and you are making the same mistake everyone made at that time. Remember, that was when oil dropped to $10.
    Exxon conceptualized the idea for this ad in the early 80's. They kept it on the burner until it was good for Exxon, the environment and the US. They began in earnest in 1995 and have put over a billion dollars into Colorado's economy since. The state of Colorado will benefit for many years to come.
    PS, Exxon did research into global warming and CO2 sequestration in the early 80's, but after oil dropped to $10, global warming was another of Exxon's lies. Remember we were then worried about the next ice age.
    After 30 years, the government will not allow ExxonMobil to pursue CO@ sequestration. All of this data is on the internet, if you just look for it.
    Your last Summer comment is the crisis we are in in a nutshell. Everyone wants to make a lot of money without working or even risking their own money.
    Dec 10 21:28 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Real Price of Gas Falls to Five-Year Lows
    Thank the refiners for subsidizing gasoline these past 9 months.
    Gasoline should have been over $6 a gallon
    Dec 06 20:07 pm |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Will Obama's Economic Policies Drag the U.S. Down?
    The problem isn't the Democrats, Republicans, automakers or even the oil companies. It is you and me. We want something for nothing. We vote for the politician that promises to put money in our pocket. Even now, there are profit takers making a lot of money with the stocks going up and down every other day. Short term capital gains should be 50% (this is what the oil companies are paying right now for corporate income taxes - so it's reasonable) Long term capital gains should be 10%.
    Nov 17 10:30 am |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Washington Post on the Quiet Windfall for U.S. Banks - For Shame!
    Even in the middle of this crisis, the banks' profit margins are 3-4 times that of the evil oil companies. When gasoline prices went up 37%, the banks' credit card profit per gallon of gas went up 37%. The refineries sold for less than the cost of the crude oil.
    Nov 14 13:00 pm |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The Bailout: How’s It Doing?
    RE: oil falling below $60. It is good that the oil companies are strong this time around or we would be in real trouble. In the 80's, the oil companies became involved in alternative energies (that still are not economically feasable). The government should probably use the same bailout for the banks as they used on the oil companies back then. Oil dropped to $10 and 300,000 people lost their job within 100 miles of where I lived. Over 400 of 675 homes in my subdivision were foreclosed on. The governments answer was to raise taxes on the oil companies and they reniged on their promises to back alternative energies (just like they will now). The oil companies had 25 really bad years and are still cutting jobs by 10% a year, but look at them now. While most companies are sending money overseas, ExxonMobil is paying more taxes in the US than they make. If you let the market alone and weed out the weak companies we will be better off.
    Nov 14 12:47 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Reality Hits Oil Market, Dollar Could Benefit
    USER218405 - I think the auto industry and oil companies would benefit greatly from a bullet train. Also stopping cross country inefficient semi truck/trailers. Rail is three times more efficient than truck. A lot of vehicles would need to be built to construct the rail. Eventually, oil companies could cut back on low margin gasolines and diesels (they lost money most of this year) and produce money-making products in their refineries.
    Nov 12 14:01 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Energy Investments Under Obama: Eye on Barclays Carbon ETN
    "Oil companies" are already paying windfall taxes. ExxonMobil alone has paid $16 billion more in taxes in the US than they made. They make most of their money elsewhere and bring the money to the US. Isn't this what we need? There are other international oil companies in the US probably doing the same thing.
    Gasoline today is $1.899 here. What does this mean?
    1700 more people will die in their vehicles the next year than the last 12 months. People will return to their wasteful driving habits, if they actually quit. Green house gases will increase. Congress will forget about alternative energy sources, as they did in the 1980's. Oil stocks will go down because most people think they make money selling gasoline.
    Nov 12 13:35 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Obama's Green Obsession: More Harm Than Good?
    We are exactly where we were in the 1980's, except it was the "oil companies" that were investing heavily into alternative energies.
    They were going to become energy companies. When crude oil prices dropped in the 80's, just like now, the government forgot about their promises to back alternative energies.
    If the "oil companies' were greedy, they would shut down their refineries and move out of the US. Refineries have lost money all year.
    The government gets over half of the cost of a gallon of gasoline.
    Over the last five years, ExxonMobil paid $16 billion more in taxes in the US than they made. They are are only one of over 500 "oil companies."
    What is the government doing with this windfall tax?
    Nov 11 22:01 pm |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment |View article

WayneS's Comments Stream Stats

  • 57 Comments, 7 , 7
  • Total Comment Stream rating - = 0