GMC

Comment Stream

Comment Stream
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:
  • Critical Memo to Obama: Do Something
    When will America wake up to the fact that politicians are elected by promising "a chicken in every pot"? Not one of Obama's big programs will happen in this economy and things will pretty much stay the same. There will be no change.
    Dec 16 08:15 am |Rating: +8 -2 |Link to Comment |View article
  • This Recession's Not That Bad - And We're More Than Halfway Through
    I hate optimists...
    Dec 16 08:10 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Ramifications of Fannie, Freddie On The U.S. Budget [Housing Tracker]
    I hate to see the USA in this mess, but in my personal budget, if suddenly I have expenses I can't handle, I start looking for things to cut and ways to earn more money. It might be a good time to seriously curtail our international spending in places like Iraq and the UN, etc, etc. Take care of our personal needs first. You can't help others if you've been personally shot in the head.
    Sep 11 10:13 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Can Gold Be Suppressed Indefinitely?
    "...we have a situation where the government, at an ever increasingly transparent level, seeks to enrich itself at the cost of its citizenry."

    So true.
    Sep 11 10:01 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Can the US Government Afford Future Bailouts?
    when will we start getting foreign aid?
    Sep 10 11:24 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Obama, McCain and Offshore Drilling
    Steve Ballmer: Agree 100%. The only caveat is that so will McCain. So would Hillary. So would Romney. So would Huckaby. So will most any politician except perhaps Paul. The difference between McCain and Obama is, as stated in the article, how much government intervention, (i.e. heavy socialism), that Obama wants to use. "Euro-economics&q... is a bad direction for any country to go in and that's the "change" Obama speaks of. Redistribution of wealth is socialism. We've allowed our government to increasingly go in that direction. So, the "change" O tries to fob off on us is really more of the same, just increased in intensity.
    Sep 10 09:12 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Crisis In Progress: Loan Spreads Widening Further [Housing Tracker]
    I used to read these posts because the titles interested me, now I look for quality submitter's names like yours. Thanks.
    Aug 29 08:30 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The Obama Plan: We Can't Entitle Our Way Out of Paying Taxes
    Agree 100% with DougM, The Saved Sailor, Whidbey and Manning.
    Think Kelly Lieberman is to think that corporations pay ANY taxes. They're just turned through to the purchasing public - an indirect tax on the buyer.
    Aug 25 11:21 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Obama's Economic Policy and Reagonomics
    If you want change go with Obama. What that change is, who knows...As C. S. Lewis said, " Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better." I prefer not to change except to revert backwards to remove much of the over-taxation and over-spending and over-meddling our government does and has done.
    If you want to leep spending more than we have, fighting wars in countries we shouldn't be in at all, or trying very hard not to say anything or do anything that might upset your voters, then go with McCain.
    If liberalism means to keep going in the direction we're going, (i.e. changing and charging the people more and more to do it), then I'm a conservative. If conservatism means staying the course we're currently on, then I'm liberal.
    Why didn't we vote for Romney or Paul instead of these two wishy-washy say and do nothing candidates?
    Aug 21 10:26 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Obama vs. McCain on Fiscal Responsibility
    Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social

    Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

    1.) That participation in the Program would be

    completely voluntary.

    2.) That the participants would only have to pay

    1% of the first $1,400 of their annual

    incomes into the Program,

    3.) That the money the participants elected to put

    into the Program would be deductible from

    their income for tax purposes each year,

    4.) That the money the participants put into the

    Independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the

    General Operating Fund, and therefore, would

    only be used to fund the Social Security

    Retirement Program, and no other

    government program, and,

    5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees

    would never be taxed as income.

    Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are

    now receiving a Social Security check every month --

    and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of

    the money we paid to the federal government to 'put

    away', you may be interested in the following:

    ----------------------...

    Q: Which political party took Social Security from the

    Independent 'Trust Fund' and put it in to the

    General Fund so that Congress could spend it?

    A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically-

    controlled House and Senate.

    ----------------------...

    Q: Which political party eliminated the income tax

    deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

    A: The Democratic Party.

    ----------------------...

    Q: Which political party started taxing Social

    Security annuities?

    A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the

    'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the

    Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.

    ----------------------...

    Q: Which political party decided to start giving

    annuity payments to immigrants?

    AND MY FAVORITE:

    A: That's right!

    Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.

    Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,

    they began to receive Social Security payments! The

    Democratic Party gave these payments to them

    even though they never paid a dime into it!

    'A government big enough to give you everything you want,

    is strong enough to take everything you have.'

    -Thomas Jeff erson
    Aug 19 08:57 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Four Reasons We Can't Call It a Recession - Yet
    Uncle Sam might say:
    "Its hard to feel good about things as they stand right now but on the other hand I've experienced much worse. So, I guess I not depressed, just down a bit. I'll be better soon. Just give me some time..."
    Aug 16 10:51 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • A Million Bucks Ain't What It Used to Be
    Don't blame congress folks, its us. We're to blame.
    Aug 13 14:01 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Please, Mr. Greenspan, Shut Up
    Greenspan and our current economic woes are a good reason that the Fed should never have been created. Cuba is a perfect example of how it will eventually reduce the populace to poverty. It just doesn't work.
    Aug 09 08:31 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Were the Tax Rebates a Bust?
    Tie the income tax to the S&P 500! That would change things a bit. Might be interesting!
    Aug 07 11:18 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Is This a Recession? Wrong Question.
    I agree, who cares if it official? We're hurting and somebody somewhere is making a ton of money from high energy prices. Something is way off here. Ten years ago the liberal congress decided to keep us from producing the oil and gas we now need. I keep asking myself what did they gain by that stance? Money had to be involved and it had to be BIG.
    Aug 04 08:05 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article

GMC's Comments Stream Stats

  • 34 Comments, 8 , 2
  • Total Comment Stream rating - = 6