dontcallmeamarter

Comment Stream

Comment Stream
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:
  • Circuit City: Outlook Is Grimmer Than Ever
    CC's real problem is that it has no identity. They are a big store...so what...they have a decent selection of electronics...yawn....... the employees are demotivated. If they want to turn this company around they would have to start by getting rid of management. To make that happen they would likely have to get rid of the board. I think BBI did hte right hting here. Instead of buying the whole company you can wait and purchase the pieces you really want out of bankruptcy!

    The real question right now is how long it will take the board to realize they can not support this management team? Too many boards get to close to management and allow themselves to be blinded to what is happening. My guess is that they are not adequately informed about the business and that is their fault for not demanding more information. I have to believe though that eventually the desire to protect their own backsides will kick in and they wil do the right thing. Will it be too late?
    Aug 14 14:25 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The Global Economy: U.S. vs. World Growth
    In your third slide and comment there you seem to be using growth and over all demand interchangeably. I am sure you are aware that is to different things and that the US consumes far more resources than China. This also explains why they have a higher growth rate.

    The average US consumer for example consumes 25 barrel equivalents of oil per year while China is estimated at between 1 and 2. It would be quite easy for them to show phenomenal growth over a short period and still consuming nothing close to what we consume. So for every 1% reduction in the US you would need a 12% increase in China for demand to remain static.

    There is an old saying that still holds true, "When the US sneezes the world catches a cold."
    Jun 26 14:45 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The 20 Highest Yielding Dividend Aristocrats
    Check out CZN and WWE if you like big dividends
    Jun 12 11:09 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • How Bad Is the Oil Shock of 2008?
    www.youtube.com/watch?...
    Jun 06 12:08 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Investing Into the End of the Hydrocarbon Age
    Yes yes, I can hear the next comment already about converting led into gold too. I think extracting Hydrogen is actually achievable though the real question has always been one of efficiency.
    Jun 05 15:29 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Investing Into the End of the Hydrocarbon Age
    I think the $500 oil comment may be a little extreme for a forceast 10 years out. By the time it reaches that point they will have effectively killed all relative demand for the commodity. Which brings me to this point, there will be demand for the commodity as long as it stays within a price range that people are willing to pay. What we are seeing now with the shifts in the automotive markets and teh airlines is that we are going to be willing to consume far less oil at $125+ than we would at $75 or $80. It appears that the elsticity of demand is reaching the breaking point where demand will far sharply.

    I agree we are seeing the end of the bydrocarbon age. There are giong to ba a lot of people though that have been profiting from this that are going to try and resist the change that is coming.

    There are manythat think we are going to be able to use Hydrogen as a substitute fuel in the near future. In the past there have been lots of rumors about this and teh auto industry has looked at the feasability previously but nothing has happened yet. I suspect one reason is that liquid hydrogen is highly exposlive and no one really relishes the idea of a hydrogen explosion following a car wreck. However, I have also been hearing rumors about some new technology to extract hydrogen from water with greater efficieny than in the past. If that's true then the fuel can be stored as water until needed, now that would be impressive.
    Jun 05 15:24 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The Oil Story: Dallas vs. Indonesia
    As with all things it is easy to draw conclusions using a 50,000 ft. view but they are usually partially correct. I think you also have to consider how much has been invested in their production during the last few decades. You could argue that by investing less near term and letting production fall that you insure production in future periods.

    There has recently been a lot of discussion about how production has also fallen off in Mexico and Vanazuela, which has at least partially been attributed to lack of investment. I think what we are seeing in terms of US domestic production leveling off and now projected to increase demonstrates that there is oil to be found but to encourage exploration we are going to have to pay up to get it.

    I think the announcement by GM that they are considering "Strategic options" with regard to the Hummer line speaks volumes. For a couple of decades now we have taken cheap energy for granted and our consumption had become an unsustainable bubble just like commodity prices are currently enjoying. Our consumption finally reached a point that with a little push from demand elsewhere caused prices to spike.

    Capitalist markets will always seek an equillibrium but in the process they are usually given to radical swings in either direction as resources are reallocated more appropriately. In another twenty years people could very well be saying, "Remember gasoline engines?"
    Jun 04 17:47 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • 'Index Speculators' Responsible For Commodity Prices?
    Markets will always seek an equillibrium. In a capitalist economy though you also tend to get exaggerations on both sides of an equation. If the market for crude demand is X at $75 and supply is willing to supply X then we have a balance. What Masters is arguing is that the legitimate purchasers of this commodity are having to pay more because speculators are bidding up the price. Instead of the bid being for X at $75 they are adding volume to the bid os it may be X+1 and the supplier says that they are not willing to provide the +1 at $75 and so the bubble begins to form.

    The bottom line is that this is not going to end well. As we have seen numerous times in the last 10 years or so speculative bubbles eventually run out of steam. The problem is that they have a tendency to expand further than we originally anticipate. The price will move forward until the speculators begin trying to cash out and they all move for the cash register at once.
    May 29 13:04 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Is This Oil Bubble Going to Deflate?
    If you guys think that this is just a supply and demand issue then simply imposing equal trading requirements on everyone shouldn't have any real impact on the price of the commodity. Let's see! Lobby your congressmen to change trading requirements so that everyone plays by the same rules. Teh commodities markets were created for farmers and corporations to hedge their exposure for their input materials. Make the traders abide by the same guidelines they live by and let's see what happens.
    May 28 13:49 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Is This Oil Bubble Going to Deflate?
    Michael Masters presentation:

    hsgac.senate.gov/publi...

    You can also read the article on Barron’s if you have access:

    online.barrons.com/art...
    May 28 13:42 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Perfect Oil Storm Brewing in the U.S.
    There was recently an article in Barron's magazine "Who's behind the Commodities Boom," and a similar presentation given to congress by Michael Masters of Masters Capital addressing the current energy situation. The current boom in commodity prices in general has little to do with supply and demand. Why do you think Saudi Arabia and OPEC are talking about cutting production? The growth in China has been going for about 10 years now and India longer than that. So what's the deal? Read this report it explains it very succinctly we have an arbitrage because there is more capital rushing into the commodities market than it can support. This is being caused by a method of trading that circumvents the normal position limits, a large influx of capital and a federal government that is going to do little about it beyond grandstanding with the top oil executives. I don't know about you but if I am Rex Tillerson I will take an ass chewing as long as I get to keep raking in about $10 billion per quarter.

    The pension funds and the ETF's do not have to deal with the same position limits as the companies actually trying to use commodities positions as a hedge for their business. There is such a disproportionate amount of the investment in commodities coming from speculators at this time that demand would have to come to a screeching halt before it would have any real impact to the price of commodities.

    So why doesn't congress act? Currently the average consumer is getting hurt, not congress, not big oil, and thus far not big business. The farmer isn't going to protest because they are getting record prices for their crops. The big oil executives aren't going to stand up and tell Congress how to fix the problem when they are getting $130 per barrel and even though Congress knows what the cause of the crisis is they are not likely to act because the beneficiaries of this speculative bubble are also large political contributors.

    Congress needs to act and all investors need to play by the same rules. Impose those same rules on pension funds and ETF's as other investors and we will have $50 oil and $2.50 gasoline within a month. Here is a link to Michael Masters presentation:

    hsgac.senate.gov/publi...

    You can also read the article on Barron’s if you have access:

    online.barrons.com/art...
    May 28 13:35 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • A Desperate Blockbuster Tries Something Else
    What I don't understand is why everyone is so quick to say that BBI is done and NFLX is killing them. Last I checked BBI had revenue of well over $4 Billion with a capital B and little NFLX just had revenues of a little over $1. That makes BBI about 4 times their size and yet all the analyst want to declare BBI the runner up!

    To many uninformed and lazy investors it may look like BBI has embarked upon some fragmented desperation moves to save itself but that's because they don't really have a clue about the business to begin with. First, I suggest that you read a transcript from the CC call or listen to a replay there are some clues in there. They would not have embarked upon this venture to begin with unless Icahn had already agreed to fund the acquisition. It sure must be nice to have a Billionaire in your back pocket!

    BBI needs the purcashing scale that CC brings for personal electronics. They are not trying to become an Apple store so you can alleviate yourself of that fantasy right now. Everybody is always trying to say that this thing is the next big thin or just like that company. I don't know how many clown analyst popped into my office trying to tell me that KKK was the next SBUX!

    Anyway, the CC acquisition gives BBI better distribution for their current inventory. Anybody that knows the company understands this aspect of their business sucks. It gives them economy in purchasing. They should be able to offer products in their stores that they can't economically offer today. They should be able to close some locations and relocate the movie rentals into a CC driving traffic to those stores. They may also be able to off some additional electronics out of BBI locations and close CC locations where it is not economical.

    Anyone curious what the new stores are going to look like should go look at the location in Frisco Texas near Lebanon and Legacy.
    Apr 30 17:35 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article

dontcallmeamarter's Comments Stream Stats

  • 12 Comments, 0 , 0
  • Total Comment Stream rating - = 0